misszee

For Christmas I got an intriguing gift from a good friend - my very own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was totally written by AI, with a few simple prompts about me provided by my friend Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty design of composing, but it's also a bit repetitive, and extremely verbose. It might have gone beyond Janet's triggers in collecting information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mysterious, repetitive hallucination in the form of my feline (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually sold around 150,000 customised books, primarily in the US, because rotating from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based on an open source large language design.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who produced it, can purchase any further copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone creating one in anybody's name, including celebs - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent content. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is imaginary, produced by AI, and designed "solely to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is intended as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get sold further.

He wants to widen his range, producing different genres such as sci-fi, and perhaps providing an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted form of customer AI - offering AI-generated items to human clients.

It's also a bit terrifying if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least since it most likely took less than a minute to generate, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound simply like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable material based upon it.

"We must be clear, when we are speaking about data here, we actually suggest human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to regard creators' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is pictures. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were fake, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not think making use of generative AI for innovative purposes need to be banned, but I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without approval ought to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be really powerful but let's develop it morally and fairly."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors using its work for forum.altaycoins.com their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and bphomesteading.com damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually selected to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have actually chosen to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would enable AI developers to use creators' material on the internet to help establish their models, unless the rights holders choose out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".

He points out that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and sitiosecuador.com logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the incomes of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is also highly against eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and a whole lot of happiness," says the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining among its finest performing industries on the vague pledge of development."

A federal government representative stated: "No move will be made until we are definitely confident we have a useful strategy that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for best holders to assist them accredit their content, access to top quality product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI strategy, a nationwide information library including public information from a vast array of sources will likewise be provided to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to improve the safety of AI with, amongst other things, companies in the sector needed to share information of the operations of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has now been repealed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is said to want the AI sector to face less guideline.

This comes as a number of claims versus AI firms, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been secured by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their authorization, and used it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a variety of elements which can make up fair usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it gathers training data and whether it should be paying for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to consider, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its technology for a portion of the price of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's present dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a as an author, I think that at the moment, if I really desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weak point in generative AI tools for larger projects. It is full of errors and hallucinations, and it can be quite difficult to read in parts since it's so verbose.

But given how quickly the tech is evolving, I'm not exactly sure the length of time I can remain confident that my considerably slower human writing and modifying abilities, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant advancements in global technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the globe.

Outside the UK? Register here.